Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 116(2): 98-105, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2256821

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation now has a major role in the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, evidence is scarce on its feasibility and safety to treat patients with pure aortic regurgitation. AIMS: We sought to evaluate the results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) in patients with pure aortic regurgitation on native non-calcified valves. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and prospective French multicentre observational study. We included all patients with symptomatic severe pure aortic regurgitation on native non-calcified valves, contraindicated to or at high risk for surgical valve replacement, who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (male sex, 73%) with a median age of 81years (interquartile range 69-85years) were screened using transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography and were included at eight French centres. At baseline, 83.8% of patients (n=31) had dyspnoea New York Heart Association class≥III. The device success rate was 94.6% (n=35). At 30days, the all-cause mortality rate was 8.1% (n=3) and valve migration occurred in 10.8% of cases (n=4). Dyspnoea New York Heart Association class≤II was seen in 86.5% of patients (n=32), and all survivors had aortic regurgitation grade≤1. At 1-year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 16.2% (n=6), 89.7% (n=26/29) of survivors were in New York Heart Association class≤II and all had aortic regurgitation grade≤2. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve seems promising to treat selected high-risk patients with pure aortic regurgitation on non-calcified native valves, contraindicated to surgical aortic valve replacement.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency , Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Male , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis Design
2.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(1)2022 Dec 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2231255

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: One of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in people over the age of 50 is stroke. The acceptance of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as a treatment option for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) has increased as a result of numerous randomized clinical trials comparing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and TAVR in high- and intermediate-risk patients, showing comparable clinical outcomes and valve hemodynamics. Materials and Methods: An electronic search of Medline, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central was carried out from their inception to 28 September 2022 without any language restrictions. Results: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that, as compared with SAVR, TAVR was not linked with a lower stroke ratio or stroke mortality. It is clear from this that the SAVR intervention techniques applied in the six studies were successful in reducing cardiogenic consequences over time. Conclusions: A significantly decreased rate of mortality from cardiogenic causes was associated with SAVR. Additionally, when TAVR and SAVR were compared for stroke mortality, the results were nonsignificant with a p value of 0.57, indicating that none of these procedures could decrease stroke-related mortality.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , COVID-19 , Myocardial Infarction , Stroke , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Aortic Valve/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Pandemics , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Risk Factors , COVID-19/complications , Stroke/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Treatment Outcome
3.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 100(12): 768-771, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2007593

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Untreated, severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis is associated with an ominous diagnosis without intervention. This study aims to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mortality of patients with severe stenosis during the first wave and compare it with the same period last year. METHODS: All patients who went to the hospitals in a spanish region during the first wave, and in the same period of previous year, were analysed using Artificial Intelligence-based software, evaluating the mortality of patients with severe aortic stenosis with and without COVID-19 during the pandemic and the pre-COVID era. Mortality of the three groups were compared. Regarding cardiac surgeries was a tendency to decrease (p = .07) in patients without COVID-19 between the pandemic and the previous period was observed. A significant decrease of surgeries between patients with COVID-19 and without COVID-19 was shown. RESULTS: Data showed 13.82% less admitted patients during the first wave. 1112 of them, had aortic stenosis and 5.48% were COVID-19 positive. Mortality was higher (p = .01), in COVID-19 negative during the pandemic (4.37%) versus those in the pre-COVID19 era (2.57%); it was also in the COVID-19 positive group (11.47%), versus covid-19 negative (4.37%) during the first wave (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed a decrease in patients who went to the hospital and an excess of mortality in patients with severe AD without infection during the first wave, compared to the same period last year; and also, in COVID-19 positive patients versus COVID-19 negative.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Artificial Intelligence , Risk Factors , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis
4.
Am J Cardiol ; 176: 105-111, 2022 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1866798

ABSTRACT

New-onset left bundle branch block (NLBBB) is the most common complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Expert consensus recommends temporary transvenous pacemaker (TTVP) support for 24 hours in these patients. To date, no study has examined TTVP use during the index hospitalization in detail. Therefore, we aimed to assess TTVP use in patients with TAVI who developed NLBBB. In this prospective observational study, we performed a detailed analysis of 24-hour telemetry in patients who developed NLBBB during TAVI. Baseline characteristics and procedural and postprocedural data were recorded. The primary outcome was pacing by the TTVP. We evaluated inappropriate TTVP use, electrophysiology study findings, permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, and NLBBB resolution. A total of 83 patients (74.4 ± 8.7 years, 41% female) developed NLBBB during TAVI. During index hospitalization, 1 patient (1%) required TTVP because of complete heart block and received a PPM. Five of the 83 (6%) patients were inappropriately paced, and 1 patient (1%) had ventricular fibrillation, likely secondary to TTVP. A total of 34 patients (41%) underwent electrophysiology study during hospitalization, with 4 of 83 (5%) subsequently receiving a PPM. One (1%) patient died during hospitalization, and 9 patients were lost to follow-up because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the remaining 73 patients with a 30-day follow-up, NLBBB had resolved in 36 (49%) at 30 days, and 2 (3%) were readmitted with complete heart block and received PPM. In conclusion, in patients with TAVI who develop NLBBB, temporary pacing is rarely necessary, may carry additional risks to the patient, and prolong hospitalization time.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Atrioventricular Block , COVID-19 , Pacemaker, Artificial , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Atrioventricular Block/etiology , Bundle-Branch Block/epidemiology , Bundle-Branch Block/etiology , Bundle-Branch Block/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Pandemics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
5.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 28(1): 87-97, 2021 03 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1387867

ABSTRACT

Along with epidemiologic transitions of the global population, the burden of aortic stenosis (AS) is rapidly increasing and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has quickly spread; indeed, it is nowadays also employed in treating patients with AS at intermediate operative risk. Nonetheless, the less invasive interventional strategy still carries relevant issues concerning post-procedural optimal antithrombotic strategy, given the current indications provided by guidelines are not completely supported by evidence-based data. Geriatric patients suffer from high bleeding and thromboembolic risks, whose balance is particularly subtle due to the presence of concomitant conditions, such as atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease, that make the post-TAVR antithrombotic management particularly insidious. This scenario is further complicated by the lack of specific evidence regarding the 'real-life' complex conditions typical of the geriatric syndromes, thus, the management of such a heterogeneous population, ranging from healthy ageing to frailty, is far from being defined. The aim of the present review is to summarize the critical points and the most updated evidence regarding the post-TAVR antithrombotic approach in the geriatric population, with a specific focus on the most frequent clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/drug therapy , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , COVID-19/complications , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Age Factors , Aged , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Humans , Risk Factors
6.
ASAIO J ; 67(4): 392-394, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1153287

ABSTRACT

A subset of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) develop profound respiratory failure and are treated via invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Of these, a smaller subset has severe gas exchange abnormalities that are refractory to maximal levels of IMV support. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used successfully in these circumstances. However, using ECMO only after failure of IMV exposes patients to the risks of ventilator-induced lung injury. We report a successful outcome using ECMO in the setting of COVID-19 in the absence of IMV failure in an awake, nonintubated patient. This approach may be beneficial for selected patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Lung Injury/etiology , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , COVID-19/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
7.
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes ; 28(2): 159-173, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1061205

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Summarize recent recommendations on clinical management of adults and youth with elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] who are at-risk of or affected by cardiovascular disease (CVD). RECENT FINDINGS: There is ample evidence to support elevated Lp(a) levels, present in approximately 20% of the general population, as a causal, independent risk factor for CVD and its role as a significant risk enhancer. Several guidelines and position statements have been published to assist in the identification, treatment and follow-up of adults with elevated levels of Lp(a). There is growing interest in Lp(a) screening and strategies to improve health behaviors starting in youth, although published recommendations for this population are limited. In addition to the well established increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and valvular aortic stenosis, data from the coronavirus pandemic suggest adults with elevated Lp(a) may have a particularly high-risk of cardiovascular complications. Lp(a)-specific-lowering therapies are currently in development. Despite their inability to lower Lp(a), use of statins have been shown to improve outcomes in primary and secondary prevention. SUMMARY: Considerable differences exist amongst published guidelines for adults on the use of Lp(a) in clinical practice, and recommendations for youth are limited. With increasing knowledge of Lp(a)'s role in CVD, including recent observations of COVID-19-related risk of cardiovascular complications, more harmonized and comprehensive guidelines for Lp(a) in clinical practice are required. This will facilitate clinical decision-making and help define best practices for identification and management of elevated Lp(a) in adults and youth.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Hyperlipoproteinemias/therapy , Lipoprotein(a)/blood , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/epidemiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Child , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hyperlipoproteinemias/blood , Hyperlipoproteinemias/diagnosis , Hyperlipoproteinemias/epidemiology , Lipoprotein(a)/physiology , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/standards , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Young Adult
8.
JAMA Cardiol ; 5(10): 1170-1175, 2020 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-636079

ABSTRACT

Importance: Cytokine release syndrome is a complication of coronavirus disease 2019. Clinically, advanced age and cardiovascular comorbidities are the most important risk factors. Objective: To determine whether clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), an age-associated condition with excess cardiovascular risk defined as the presence of an expanded, mutated somatic blood cell clone in persons without other hematological abnormalities, may be associated with an inflammatory gene expression sensitizing monocytes to aggravated immune responses. Design, Setting, and Participants: This hypothesis-generating diagnostic study examined a cohort of patients with severe degenerative aortic valve stenosis or chronic postinfarction heart failure, as well as age-matched healthy control participants. Single-cell RNA sequencing and analyses of circulating peripheral monocytes was done between 2017 and 2019 to assess the transcriptome of circulating monocytes. Exposures: Severe degenerative aortic valve stenosis or chronic postinfarction heart failure. Main Outcomes and Measures: CHIP-driver sequence variations in monocytes with a proinflammatory signature of genes involved in cytokine release syndrome. Results: The study included 8 patients with severe degenerative aortic valve stenosis, 6 with chronic postinfarction heart failure, and 3 healthy control participants. Their mean age was 75.7 (range, 54-89) years, and 6 were women. Mean CHIP-driver gene variant allele frequency was 4.2% (range, 2.5%-6.9%) for DNMT3A and 14.3% (range, 2.6%-37.4%) for TET2. Participants with DNMT3A or TET2 CHIP-driver sequence variations displayed increased expression of interleukin 1ß (no CHIP-driver sequence variations, 1.6217 normalized Unique Molecular Identifiers [nUMI]; DNMT3A, 5.3956 nUMI; P < .001; TET2, 10.8216 nUMI; P < .001), the interleukin 6 receptor (no CHIP-driver sequence variations, 0.5386 nUMI; DNMT3A, 0.9162 nUMI; P < .001;TET2, 0.5738 nUMI; P < .001), as well as the NLRP3 inflammasome complex (no CHIP-driver sequence variations, 0.4797 nUMI; DNMT3A, 0.9961 nUMI; P < .001; TET2, 1.2189 nUMI; P < .001), plus upregulation of CD163 (no CHIP-driver sequence variations, 0.5239 nUMI; DNMT3A, 1.4722 nUMI; P < .001; TET2, 1.0684 nUMI; P < .001), a cellular receptor capable of mediating infection, macrophage activation syndrome, and other genes involved in cytokine response syndrome. Gene ontology term analyses of regulated genes revealed that the most significantly upregulated genes encode for leukocyte-activation and interleukin-signaling pathways in monocytes of individuals with DNMT3A (myeloid leukocyte activation: log[Q value], -50.1986; log P value, -54.5177; regulation of cytokine production: log[Q value], -21.0264; log P value, -24.1993; signaling by interleukins: log[Q value], -18.0710: log P value, -21.1597) or TET2 CHIP-driver sequence variations (immune response: log[Q value], -36.3673; log P value, -40.6864; regulation of cytokine production: log[Q value], -13.1733; log P value, -16.3463; signaling by interleukins: log[Q value], -12.6547: log P value, -15.7977). Conclusions and Relevance: Monocytes of individuals who carry CHIP-driver sequence variations and have cardiovascular disease appear to be primed for excessive inflammatory responses. Further studies are warranted to address potential adverse outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in patients with CHIP-driver sequence variations.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Clonal Hematopoiesis/genetics , Gene Expression , Heart Failure/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antigens, CD/metabolism , Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic/metabolism , COVID-19/complications , Case-Control Studies , Cytokine Release Syndrome/genetics , Cytokines/metabolism , DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases/genetics , DNA Methyltransferase 3A , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Dioxygenases , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Variation , Heterozygote , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monocytes , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Receptors, Cell Surface/metabolism , Receptors, Interleukin-6/metabolism , Transcriptome
10.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 13(16): 1937-1944, 2020 08 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-457057

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created uncertainty in the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis. This population experiences high mortality from delays in treatment of valve disease but is largely overlapping with the population of highest mortality from COVID-19. The authors present strategies for managing patients with severe aortic stenosis in the COVID-19 era. The authors suggest transitions to virtual assessments and consultation, careful pruning and planning of necessary testing, and fewer and shorter hospital admissions. These strategies center on minimizing patient exposure to COVID-19 and expenditure of human and health care resources without significant sacrifice to patient outcomes during this public health emergency. Areas of innovation to improve care during this time include increased use of wearable and remote devices to assess patient performance and vital signs, devices for facile cardiac assessment, and widespread use of clinical protocols for expedient discharge with virtual physical therapy and cardiac rehabilitation options.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Global Health , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL